Shame on you, stupid spammers.. Sh4meful  DMARC Spoof Detection

IP Address: 98.184.104.180

Dormant. IP address 98.184.104.180 is registered to Cox Communications Inc and geolocates to Tulsa, United States. It first appeared in sh4meful's dataset on November 24, 2024 and was most recently observed on November 25, 2024. Over the observation window, it has failed DMARC alignment 2 times, targeting one sender domain. Its reverse DNS resolves to wsip-98-184-104-180.tu.ok.cox.net. Network context: this address sits within CXA (Cox Communications Inc), a network sh4meful has observed producing 4 failures across 3 distinct IPs during the same window.

Failure Activity Over Time

This IP has claimed to send from 1 sender domain monitored by sh4meful. The single targeted domain suggests either a compromised sending source or a spoofing attempt focused on a specific brand.

This page shows DMARC authentication failure data for this IP address. Learn more about this data.

Geolocation Information
Country:
US United States
Region:
Oklahoma
City:
Tulsa
Coordinates:
36.0944, -95.9717
WHOIS Information
Network Name:
CXA
CIDR:
98.160.0.0/11
Owner:
Cox Communications Inc.
Org ID:
CXA
Address:
1400 Lake Hearn Dr., Atlanta, GA 30319
Reverse DNS:
wsip-98-184-104-180.tu.ok.cox.net
Last updated: 2/5/2026

Analysis

This IP generated DMARC authentication failures across 2 messages in a short window between November 24, 2024 and November 25, 2024. Every message observed from this source failed both SPF and DKIM verification. Receiving mail providers applied a reject disposition, refusing delivery outright.

The reverse DNS record (wsip-98-184-104-180.tu.ok.cox.net) matches a generic cloud provider hostname pattern, indicating the host has not been specifically configured as mail infrastructure. Dedicated mail servers typically publish branded PTR records (mail.example.com, smtp.example.com) rather than default provisioning values.

Geolocation places the host in Tulsa, United States, on infrastructure operated by Cox Communications Inc. Abuse-reporting channels in this jurisdiction are generally responsive, and reports to the network operator can result in timely remediation.

The address belongs to Cox Communications Inc, a residential ISP. Mail originating directly from residential IP space is almost never legitimate: ISPs block outbound port 25 for consumer customers, and residential addresses that do emit SMTP traffic are typically compromised devices in a botnet, including home routers, IoT devices, or infected personal computers.

Across the wider CXA network, 3 distinct IPs have been associated with 4 authentication failures over 4 observed messages, spanning 1 country. Most observed IPs on this network contribute to the failure count, suggesting the range as a whole warrants elevated scrutiny.

If your domain appears in the From header of mail from this address, treat it as probable spoofing. Verify that your SPF record does not authorize this host, directly or through nested include mechanisms, and that no DKIM selector you publish has been issued to it. If both checks come back clean, the receiver's reject action is doing its job.

Your DMARC policy posture matters more than any IP-level response here. The enforcement action applied to this mail indicates your policy is already providing protection. Maintaining p=reject across all your domains closes the gap for attackers who manage partial alignment. Domains that remain at p=none long-term tend to be impersonated repeatedly, because the cost to the attacker of attempting is effectively zero.

Blocking this individual address has limited durability: an attacker can rotate to another address in the same /24 subnet at effectively zero cost. More durable responses include monitoring aggregate DMARC reports so new sources are visible as they emerge, tightening SPF to remove overly permissive include chains or +all mechanisms, and ensuring DKIM is signing every legitimate outbound stream so alignment failures are unambiguous. The formal abuse contact for Cox Communications Inc is listed in ARIN WHOIS records, and timely remediation is achievable through that channel.

Failures Detected from this IP
Showing 1-2 of 2 failures, affecting 2 messages
Date โ–ผ Messages
11/25/2024 1
11/24/2024 1
External Reputation Lookups

Look up this IP in external threat intelligence and reputation databases (opens in new tab):

Recommended Action

If this IP appears in your own DMARC reports, treat it as an unauthorized sender unless you have specifically verified it as a legitimate service you use. Ensure your DMARC policy is at p=quarantine or p=reject to prevent delivery of messages this IP claims to send from your domain. If you're new to DMARC, our complete guide walks through the mechanics.