Shame on you, stupid spammers.. Sh4meful  DMARC Spoof Detection

IP Address: 82.194.31.25

This page shows DMARC authentication failure data for this IP address. Learn more about this data.

Geolocation Information
Country:
AZ Azerbaijan
Region:
Baku City
City:
Baku
Coordinates:
40.3771, 49.8875
WHOIS Information
Network Name:
ENGINET-CLIENT-NAT
CIDR:
82.194.31.0/24
Owner:
Enginet-Route-82.194.31.0/24
Reverse DNS:
network.enginet.az
Last updated: 4/7/2026

Analysis

This IP was observed generating a single DMARC authentication failure on April 6, 2026. With only one data point, the event is better read as a single suspicious observation than a sustained campaign. Every message observed from this source failed both SPF and DKIM verification. Receiving mail providers applied a reject disposition, refusing delivery outright.

The reverse DNS record resolves to network.enginet.az. Whether this represents legitimate mail infrastructure depends on whether the hostname aligns with the domains this address is claiming to send on behalf of.

Geolocation places the host in Baku, Azerbaijan, on infrastructure operated by Enginet-Route-82.194.31.0/24. Abuse-reporting channels exist in this jurisdiction but historical response rates are inconsistent, meaning remediation is more often handled through receiver-side blocking than provider-side takedown.

The address is registered to Enginet-Route-82.194.31.0/24 (ENGINET-CLIENT-NAT). Enterprise-registered addresses that appear in DMARC failure data are typically either compromised hosts on the organization's network or outbound mail relays that are not properly authorized in the domain's SPF record.

Across the wider ENGINET-CLIENT-NAT network, 1 distinct IP has been associated with 1 authentication failures over 1 observed messages, spanning 1 country. Activity on this network is sparse in this dataset, suggesting isolated rather than systematic abuse.

If your domain appears in the From header of mail from this address, treat it as probable spoofing. Verify that your SPF record does not authorize this host, directly or through nested include mechanisms, and that no DKIM selector you publish has been issued to it. If both checks come back clean, the receiver's reject action is doing its job.

Your DMARC policy posture matters more than any IP-level response here. The enforcement action applied to this mail indicates your policy is already providing protection. Maintaining p=reject across all your domains closes the gap for attackers who manage partial alignment. Domains that remain at p=none long-term tend to be impersonated repeatedly, because the cost to the attacker of attempting is effectively zero.

Blocking this individual address has limited durability: an attacker can rotate to another address in the same /24 subnet at effectively zero cost. More durable responses include monitoring aggregate DMARC reports so new sources are visible as they emerge, tightening SPF to remove overly permissive include chains or +all mechanisms, and ensuring DKIM is signing every legitimate outbound stream so alignment failures are unambiguous. The formal abuse contact for Enginet-Route-82.194.31.0/24 is listed in RIPE WHOIS records, though response rates from this jurisdiction are inconsistent.

Failures Detected from this IP
Showing 1-1 of 1 failures, affecting 1 message
External Reputation Lookups

Look up this IP in external threat intelligence and reputation databases (opens in new tab):