IP Address: 63.59.67.73
This page shows DMARC authentication failure data for this IP address. Learn more about this data.
Geolocation Information
- Country:
- US United States
- Coordinates:
- 37.751, -97.822
WHOIS Information
- Network Name:
- NETBLK-UUNET97DU
- CIDR:
63.40.0.0/13, 63.48.0.0/12, 63.36.0.0/14- Owner:
- Verizon Business
- Org ID:
MCICS- Address:
- 22001 Loudoun County Pkwy, Ashburn, VA 20147
- Reverse DNS:
-
twbgohaavzwvmta-c-rh-cmta-01-sms-01.vtext.com
Last updated: 2/5/2026
Analysis
This IP was observed generating a single DMARC authentication failure on September 6, 2024. With only one data point, the event is better read as a single suspicious observation than a sustained campaign. Every message observed from this source failed both SPF and DKIM verification. Receiving mail providers applied a quarantine disposition, routing messages to spam or junk folders.
The reverse DNS record resolves to twbgohaavzwvmta-c-rh-cmta-01-sms-01.vtext.com. Whether this represents legitimate mail infrastructure depends on whether the hostname aligns with the domains this address is claiming to send on behalf of.
Geolocation places the host in United States, on infrastructure operated by Verizon Business. Abuse-reporting channels in this jurisdiction are generally responsive, and reports to the network operator can result in timely remediation.
The address belongs to Verizon Business, a residential ISP. Mail originating directly from residential IP space is almost never legitimate: ISPs block outbound port 25 for consumer customers, and residential addresses that do emit SMTP traffic are typically compromised devices in a botnet, including home routers, IoT devices, or infected personal computers.
Across the wider NETBLK-UUNET97DU network, 5 distinct IPs have been associated with 8 authentication failures over 8 observed messages, spanning 1 country. Most observed IPs on this network contribute to the failure count, suggesting the range as a whole warrants elevated scrutiny.
If your domain appears in the From header of mail from this address, treat it as probable spoofing. Verify that your SPF record does not authorize this host, directly or through nested include mechanisms, and that no DKIM selector you publish has been issued to it. If both checks come back clean, the receiver's quarantine action is doing its job.
Your DMARC policy posture matters more than any IP-level response here. The enforcement action applied to this mail indicates your policy is already providing protection. Maintaining p=reject across all your domains closes the gap for attackers who manage partial alignment. Domains that remain at p=none long-term tend to be impersonated repeatedly, because the cost to the attacker of attempting is effectively zero.
Blocking this individual address has limited durability: an attacker can rotate to another address in the same /24 subnet at effectively zero cost. More durable responses include monitoring aggregate DMARC reports so new sources are visible as they emerge, tightening SPF to remove overly permissive include chains or +all mechanisms, and ensuring DKIM is signing every legitimate outbound stream so alignment failures are unambiguous. The formal abuse contact for Verizon Business is listed in ARIN WHOIS records, and timely remediation is achievable through that channel.
Network Topology
External Reputation Lookups
Look up this IP in external threat intelligence and reputation databases (opens in new tab):
Nearby IPs
Other IPs in the 63.59.67.0/24 range observed failing DMARC:
63.59.67.71 (2 failures), 63.59.67.70 (1 failure)