IP Address: 24.249.227.19
This page shows DMARC authentication failure data for this IP address. Learn more about this data.
Geolocation Information
- Country:
- US United States
- Region:
- Texas
- City:
- Ennis
- Coordinates:
- 32.3322, -96.6206
WHOIS Information
- Network Name:
- NETBLK-COX-ATLANTA-8
- CIDR:
24.248.0.0/13- Owner:
- Cox Communications Inc.
- Org ID:
CXA- Address:
- 1400 Lake Hearn Dr., Atlanta, GA 30319
- Reverse DNS:
-
24-249-227-19.perimetercenter.net
Last updated: 2/5/2026
Analysis
This IP has generated DMARC failures across 9 messages over a long period from September 20, 2024 to June 4, 2025. The low volume sustained over time suggests infrequent or low-priority abuse activity. Every message observed from this source failed both SPF and DKIM verification. Receiving mail providers applied a reject disposition, refusing delivery outright.
The reverse DNS record resolves to 24-249-227-19.perimetercenter.net. Whether this represents legitimate mail infrastructure depends on whether the hostname aligns with the domains this address is claiming to send on behalf of.
Geolocation places the host in Ennis, United States, on infrastructure operated by Cox Communications Inc. Abuse-reporting channels in this jurisdiction are generally responsive, and reports to the network operator can result in timely remediation.
The address belongs to Cox Communications Inc, a residential ISP. Mail originating directly from residential IP space is almost never legitimate: ISPs block outbound port 25 for consumer customers, and residential addresses that do emit SMTP traffic are typically compromised devices in a botnet, including home routers, IoT devices, or infected personal computers.
Across the wider NETBLK-COX-ATLANTA-8 network, 2 distinct IPs have been associated with 15 authentication failures over 15 observed messages, spanning 1 country. Activity on this network is sparse in this dataset, suggesting isolated rather than systematic abuse.
If your domain appears in the From header of mail from this address, treat it as probable spoofing. Verify that your SPF record does not authorize this host, directly or through nested include mechanisms, and that no DKIM selector you publish has been issued to it. If both checks come back clean, the receiver's reject action is doing its job.
Your DMARC policy posture matters more than any IP-level response here. The enforcement action applied to this mail indicates your policy is already providing protection. Maintaining p=reject across all your domains closes the gap for attackers who manage partial alignment. Domains that remain at p=none long-term tend to be impersonated repeatedly, because the cost to the attacker of attempting is effectively zero.
Blocking this individual address has limited durability: an attacker can rotate to another address in the same /24 subnet at effectively zero cost. More durable responses include monitoring aggregate DMARC reports so new sources are visible as they emerge, tightening SPF to remove overly permissive include chains or +all mechanisms, and ensuring DKIM is signing every legitimate outbound stream so alignment failures are unambiguous. The formal abuse contact for Cox Communications Inc is listed in ARIN WHOIS records, and timely remediation is achievable through that channel.
External Reputation Lookups
Look up this IP in external threat intelligence and reputation databases (opens in new tab):
Nearby IPs
Other IPs in the 24.249.227.0/24 range observed failing DMARC:
24.249.227.18 (6 failures)